I remember wondering, the first time I learned of this, how it was possible that I had somehow made it to 20-years-old without knowing this had happened.
It is brilliance.
Jane Elliott, in 1968, the day after Martin Luther King, Jr. was assassinated, decided it was time to try the experiment she had been considering for some time. She believed that in order for her 3rd graders to understand the true impact and influence of bigotry, they had to be able to experience it first-hand. So in her class that day, she explained that blue-eyed people are better than brown-eyed people. She, this trustworthy authory figure in these 8-year-olds lives, was telling them that blue-eyed children are smarter, behave better, and are generally superior to the brown-eyed. Blue-eyed children were allowed greater privilige in the class, ranging from extra recess time to greater praise during the lessons. Conversely, brown-eyed children were admonished from playing with blue-eyed children. Brown-eyed children were required to wear collars over their clothes so that their brown-eyed status could be identified from far away. Immediately, the class divided. Rivalries sprang up. Insults and mistreatment ensued. Name calling started and fights on the playground erupted.
The next day, Ms. Elliott informed the class that she had been mistaken. In was the brown-eyed people, in fact, who were superior to blue-eyed people. Therefore, she instructed the brown-eyed children to remove their collars and place them instead on a blue-eyed student. Well, they couldn’t snap those collars on to the blue-eyeds fast enough. These same children who just a day before lamented the unfairness of the situation now gloated and rejoiced in their newfound positions of superiority and privilege. At the end of the second day, Ms. Elliott discussed with her class their feelings surrounding the experiment. These children were forced to account for the way they treated each other, and to explain why. Too young or scared or respectful toward their teacher or naive yet to just lie, they admitted that their disappointing behavior was a result of their feelings of disgust and rejection toward the other kids’ different eye color. When asked if they thought eye color was a legitimate way of determining one’s worth, they all agreed it wasn’t, and when asked if they’d like to abandon the experiment and return to the normal classroom function, they cheered. They embraced each other. They looked as though they had reunited after being apart for a long time. It had only been 2 days.
There is much to write about surrounding Ms. Elliott and her Class Divided. I am inspired by the kids and their fundamental desire to get along with each other. I am inspired by the fact that these kids trusted their teacher so implicitly, and were willing to follow her lead, no matter how uneasy it made them. But above all, I am inspired by Jane Elliott. That a white woman, in a white school, in Iowa, in the late 1960s, would choose not only to teach about racism, but to do so in such a demonstrative, immersive, emotional way, is amazing. It is remarkable. It is Heroic. I don’t know if her fellow teachers were supportive, or if the school’s administration was supportive. I don’t know if she even asked them about it before she conducted the experiment that April day in 1968. Whether encouraged or hindered by the circumstances, she did it. At one of the most volatile times in the country’s history, she could have chosen instead to insulate herself from having to deal with the racial turmoil – she lived in Iowa, after all – but didn’t. Understanding that her responsibility to equip these little people for life extended beyond arithmetic and poetry, and that to ignore what was happening at that time would not only be neglectful, it would be a failure on her part. Whatever her motivation, whatever else COULD have happened, she did this. She changed these children’s lives.
The truth is, we are ALWAYS in need of teachers – of people – like Jane Elliott. There is no shortage of opportunity for our children to learn how to ostracize, to hate, to bully, to belittle, and to mistreat others based on one’s race, one’s socio-economic standing, one’s sexual orientation, or any of hundreds more pseudo-reasons. What there does seem to be a shortage of are the Jane Elliotts who are so fiercly committed to addressing these scars, these scourages on our society, on our children, and on us, that they are compelled to create solutions where none make themselves obvious. She didn’t use fear to advance an agenda, she taught compassion through empathy. She didn’t preach fire and brimstone, she walked through the experience right along side her students. She didn’t gloss over, obfuscate, sugar coat, qualify, or temper what she was trying to do, or the circumstances that required it to be done in the first place.
Her “Class Divided” exercise taught a lesson to lessen. To lessen hate, to lessen fear, to lessen complacency. Please watch part one below, or click HERE, and be inspired.